Legal Opinion

Dallas County State Bank v. Crismon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 4, 1921No. 8557PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Dallas County Court; T. A. Work, Judge. Suit by the Dallas County State Bank against B. E. Crismon and others. Judgment granting plaintiff insufficient relief, and it brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.

This suit was brought by Dallas County. State Bank against B. E. Crismon, Used Ford Corporation, and E. U. Conrad to recover balance due on a note secured by chattel mortgage executed by said Crismon payable to Used Ford Corporation and transferred for value and before maturity by said corporation to said bank, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage on an automobile truck. Conrad was made a party defendant by the bank, he having possession of the truck claiming a mechanic’s lien thereon. Defendant Crismon filed no answer. There was no issue as to the amount due the bank or as to the validity of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Type Founders' Co. v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Denison v. ShulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Holt v. SchwarzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commercial Credit Co. v. BrownTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. San Antonio Cattle Loan v. Blalack SonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Colonial Finance, Inc. v. All Miami Ford, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  4. Commercial Credit Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Lock v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API