Legal Opinion

People v. Armendariz

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1956No. Crim. 5539PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

The sufficiency of the evidence is the only question posed by this appeal.

Pour men were accused by information of robbery, armed with deadly weapons. (Pen. Code, § 211.) Defendant Calderan was alleged to have suffered two prior felony convictions. Appellant Moreno had also been convicted previously twice, first for violating section 503 of the Vehicle Code and, second, violating section 11500, Héalth & Safety Code, both felonies. All parties were represented by counsel. All were convicted as charged, except Armendariz and Moreno were not personally armed. The fact is that the latter two were…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. WayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. SampsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. People v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. People v. Le GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. People v. BattleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. People v. SzczechowiczCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API