Legal Opinion

Susinka v. Copenhaver

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 4, 2013No. 12-3300PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Federal inmate Stephen Susinka petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, see 28 U.S.C. § 2241, asserting that the Bureau of Prisons has miscalculated his release date by not crediting him for time served on what he calls a “fully concurrent” state sentence. Because Susinka is actually attempting to relitigate a sentencing argument that he lost on direct appeal, we *725affirm the district court’s denial of his petition.

Susinka was convicted in 2009 for his role in a racketeering conspiracy, see 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), and sentenced to 20 years in federal prison. At that time he had been in state…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Susinka v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  2. Gunn v. EmmerichDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023
  3. Lawson, Julius v. Marske, M.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API