Legal Opinion

Susinka v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 14, 2014No. 13 C 1693PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RUBÉN CASTILLO, Chief Judge.

Presently before the Court is Petitioner Stephen Susinka’s pro se motion to reconsider this Court’s order denying his petition to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (R. 10, Pet’r’s Mot.) For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s motion is denied, and this case is dismissed with prejudice.

RELEVANT FACTS

The relevant facts relating to Petitioner’s criminal conviction are set forth in a pair of opinions by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, see United States v. Benabe, 654 F.3d 753, 757 (7th…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. HoonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. S.B.C. Flood Waste Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  3. United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API