Susinka v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RUBÉN CASTILLO, Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court is Petitioner Stephen Susinka’s pro se motion to reconsider this Court’s order denying his petition to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (R. 10, Pet’r’s Mot.) For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s motion is denied, and this case is dismissed with prejudice.
RELEVANT FACTS
The relevant facts relating to Petitioner’s criminal conviction are set forth in a pair of opinions by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, see United States v. Benabe, 654 F.3d 753, 757 (7th…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. HoonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. S.B.C. Flood Waste Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022