Legal Opinion

Ware v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided December 7, 2016No. CASE NO. 3:16-CV-617-CDL-SRWPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CLAYD. LAND, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiffs Gregory and Sharon Ware purchased a homeowners insurance policy from Metropolitan Group Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“MetLife”). When a fire damaged their home, they made a claim under that policy for the damages. Under their policy, the Wares were entitled to an amount equal to the “actual cash value” of the cost to repair the fire damage. “Actual cash value” is defined in the policy as “the amount which it would cost to repair or replace covered property with material of like kind and quality, less allowance for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SladeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Safeway Ins. Co. of Alabama, Inc. v. HerreraSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Redcorn v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  5. Adams v. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Andrea Perry v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Arnold v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2017
  3. Lammert v. Auto-Owners (Mutual) Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
  4. Arnold v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2017
  5. Cranfield ex rel. Situated v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API