Legal Opinion

Howell v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 11, 1930PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaw, P. J.

In the Circuit Court this case presented an issue of devisavit vel non, on certain “writings” propounded as the holographic will of John P. Farrelly. deceased. At the close of all the evidence, the trial judge, on motion of the contestants, peremptorily directed the jury to return a verdict in favor of the contestants and “against the will sought t" be set up,” which was done, and the court thereupon adjudged that “the papers mentioned in the declaration and in the said motion of the heirs of John P. Farrelly, Hugh C. Moore and others, are not, nor is anyone or any part of them, tbe last will…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Brown v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Wildman Mfg. Co. v. Davenport Hosiery MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Carpenter v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Tyrus v. Kansas City, Ft. Scott & Memphis RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Brenizer v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1928

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bearman v. CamatsosTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Scott v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  3. Campbell v. HenleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  5. Nashville Trust Co. v. GrimesTennessee Supreme Court · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API