Legal Opinion

Rowe v. City of North Tonawanda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment unanimously' affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendant, the City of North Tonawanda (City), for a directed verdict and properly dismissed the complaint on the merits for plaintiffs failure to establish that the City received written notice of the alleged defect in the street. Pursuant to the City charter, such notice is a condition precedent to an action against the City (see, Katz v City of New York, 87 NY2d 241, 243; Cipriano v City of New York, 96 AD2d 817, 818; see generally, Barry v Niagara Frontier Tr. Sys., 35 NY2d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Amabile v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Poirier v. City of SchenectadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Katz v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Barry v. Niagara Frontier Transit System, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Cipriano v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API