Legal Opinion

Corbitt v. Stolwein

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 11, 1935No. 835Published

1Opinion of the Court

NEVIN, District Judge.

This cause is before the court on a motion filed on behalf of the defendant who, without entering or intending to enter his appearance in this cause, appears solely and specifically for the purposes of this motion to object to the jurisdiction of the court over him. Defendant moves that the issuance, service, and return of summons herein be quashed, set aside and held for naught, as not being in conformity to law. Defendant claims that as a result thereof the court has acquired no jurisdiction over him.

The cause was originally filed in the common pleas court of Clark…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Gesell v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. O'Tier v. SellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  5. Riley v. LamsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API