Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael B. Mitchell Clarence M. Mitchell, III

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 28, 1989No. 88-5529PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge:

Michael B. Mitchell and Clarence B. Mitchell, III (“appellants” or “the Mitch-ells”) appeal their convictions of corruptly endeavoring to obstruct a congressional investigation, 18 U.S.C. § 1505, and of wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Michael Mitchell also appeals his conviction on a separate count of wire fraud. Finding no error as to any of the convictions, we affirm.

I

This is another of the many prosecutions related to Wedtech Corporation, a manufacturing firm located in the South Bronx, New York. Wedtech was a rather small manufacturing firm until, in 1979, it became…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. William J. CintoloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Aleksandrs v. LaurinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Isassi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. United States v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Leo BishopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Akzo, N.V.District Court, D. Maryland · 1991
  5. United States v. Horacio AlvaradoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API