Legal Opinion

Maye v. Pundt

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 4, 1996No. S96A0876PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Justice.

The appellant, John Linzie Maye, challenges the election of appellee, Edith Pundt, to the City Council of Wadley, Georgia. The critical issue is whether the election superintendent for the City of Wadley was required by law to place Maye’s nickname of “Tubby” on the ballot. The trial court concluded that the election superintendent was not required to do so, and that even if she were, Maye had hot carried his burden to prove that the failure to place his nickname on the ballot changed or placed in doubt the result of the election. We agree with both, of these rulings and find…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hammond v. PaulSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Laite v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. State of Georgia v. CarswellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Walker v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  5. Weathers v. Modern Masonry Materials, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mead v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. Mead v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API