Legal Opinion

Mead v. Sheffield

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 2, 2004No. S04A1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

601 S.E.2d 99 (2004)

278 Ga. 268

MEAD

v.

SHEFFIELD et al.

No. S04A1982.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

September 2, 2004.

Marc B. Hershovitz, Marc B. Hershovitz, P.C., Atlanta; Charles W. Byrd, Perry, for appellant.

Nancy I. Jordan, Marietta; King & Spalding, Michael C. Russ, John S. Darden, Atlanta; Bentley, Bentley & Bentley, Fred D. Bentley, Jr., Marietta; Wasson, Sours & Harris, P.C., John D. Sours, Andrea L. May, Atlanta; Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Dennis R. Dunn, Deputy Atty. Gen., Stefan E. Ritter, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for appellees.

W. Ashley Hawkins, pro se.

Thomas C. Rawlings, pro…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Hunstein; Concurrence · Hunstein; Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Taggart v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. O'DONNELL v. DurhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  3. Fladell v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Bd.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. Mead v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  5. McCranie v. MullisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API