Campbell v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
1. Appellant contends in his first enumeration of error that his motion for directed verdict should properly have been granted because the arresting officer was not qualified under Code Ann. § 92A-2108. Code Ann. § 92A-2115 makes "any proceeding under” an arrest by unqualified officers null and void. We have considered and rejected this same argument in Rogers v. State, 133 Ga. App. 513 (211 SE2d 373), wherein it was held: "The indictment, trial, and conviction of the defendants was not a 'proceeding under’ an arrest.... It is inconceivable to us that the legislature…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Perdue v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Downing v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Interstate Life & Accident Insurance v. WhitlockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Pittman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- American Family Life Insurance v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Stevens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Maldonado v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Hendrick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Stringer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.