Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Godkin
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 23, 1904No. Docket No. 86PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Case made from Bay; Shepard, J. Assumpsit by Ira Wilson against John Godkin for work and labor. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and. defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The defendant was the owner of a sawmill at Milakokia, Schoolcraft county, and on the 23d of June, 1902, entered into a contract with plaintiff as follows:
“Memorandum of agreement, made this 23d day of June, 1902, between Ira Wilson, party of the first part, and John Godkin, of Bay City, Michigan, party of the second part:
“Said party of the first part, for and in consideration of a sum hereinafter mentioned, agrees to go to Milakokia, Schoolcraft county, Michigan, when directed by second party, and work for said second party for three months, more or less, or until said second party’s logs…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lamson v. City of MarshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Huntingdon v. . ClaffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Spicer v. EarlMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Whiting v. Village of New BaltimoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Tennessee Manufacturing Co. v. JamesTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Ann Arbor Asphalt Construction Co. v. City of HowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Wilson v. GodkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Germain v. Union School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1909