Ann Arbor Asphalt Construction Co. v. City of Howell
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
The question presented for decision by defendant’s assignments, of error is whether the court erred in holding that $20 per day after contract time was a penalty rather than stipulated damages. Plaintiff sued on a contract for paving, claiming balance due of $2,660. Defendant city withheld the amount as damages for 138 days’ delay in completing the contract, at $20 per day. Under the contract there were six separate areas to be paved, three areas on Michigan avenue, the main street of the city, being 73 per cent, of the yardage, two blocks on Clinton street 8 per cent, of the yardage, two…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jaquith v. HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
- Cotheal v. . TalmageNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Daily v. LitchfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Lamson v. City of MarshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Whiting v. Village of New BaltimoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moore v. St Clair CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Federal Electric Co. v. National Service StationsMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Lemberg v. VisnawMichigan Supreme Court · 1926