Legal Opinion
Matthews v. McDonough
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 12, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2021-1607Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROBERT R. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-1607 (RDM) DENIS R. MCDONOUGH, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER For the reasons that follow, the Court will DENY Plaintiffs’ motions for leave to amend, Dkt. 68; Dkt. 70; Dkt. 71; Dkt. 72; Dkt. 77, and will DENY Defendants’ motion to dismiss, Dkt. 64. A. This case arises out of medical treatment Matthews received at a Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) facility in Washington, D.C. See Dkt. 39. Matthews initiated the case by filing a succession of pro se complaints…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.