Legal Opinion

In Re Kellar

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided December 5, 1996No. Bankruptcy 93-40056 SPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AVOID JUDICIAL LIEN

MARY D. SCOTT, Bankruptcy Judge.

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the debtors’ Motion to Avoid Judicial Lien on Exempt Property Under Section 522(f), filed on August 5, 1996, to which the creditor Purina Mills, Inc. (“Purina”) responded. The debtors seek to avoid the judicial lien of Purina on the grounds that the lien impairs their homestead exemption. Purina argues that since, under Arkansas law, the lien does not attach to the homestead, there is no impairment of the exemption.

The parties stipulated that the debtors properly claim a homestead…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harris v. Herman (In Re Herman)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. In Re CalandrielloUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1989
  3. Packer v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. (In Re Packer)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1989
  4. In Re JacobsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re RichardsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Humes v. LVNV Funding, L.L.C. (In re Humes)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2013
  3. In Re LinaneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  4. Peoples Heritage Bank, N.A. v. Hart (In Re Hart)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2002
  5. Caine v. First State Bank (In re Caine)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API