Biddle v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The indictment contained two counts; the first count charged the manufacture of prohibited liquors, and the second count charged the possession of a still. There was a general verdict of guilty.
The appellant, defendant in the court below, applied for a continuance of the ease on the ground that he had been ordered by the government authorities to New Orleans-for physical examination.
The granting or refusal of an application for continuance is matter of discretion with the trial court, and its action thereon is not revisable on appeal. Carr v. State, 104 Ala. 4, 16 South. 150; Lowery v. State,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Malachi v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Lowery v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Snoddy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Elmore v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- Harris v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
- McGrew v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.