Legal Opinion

Alexander v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 6, 1979PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant was convicted of robbery and sentenced to twenty-five years' imprisonment. He argues that his conviction should be reversed for three reasons.

I

"The fact that a defendant has an attorney does not mean, as a per se rule, that law enforcement officials cannot procure a statement of any kind from the defendant without prior notice to, if not the consent of, the attorney." This rule was fully discussed and applied in Thompson v. State,347 So.2d 1371 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 347 So.2d 1377 (Ala. 1977). In Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 97 S.Ct. 1232, 1243,51 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977),…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Brister v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  4. Ex Parte ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Snoddy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Staton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. Stringer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. Revis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API