Legal Opinion
CROCKETT v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 23, 2023No. 2:19-cv-00276Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KATHERINE CROCKETT, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; NO. 19-276 AMERICAN REGENT, INC.; DAIICHI SANKYO, INC.; DAIICHI SANKYO US HOLDINGS, INC.; and VIFOR (INTERNATIONAL) AG, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This drug product liability case, one among many brought against Defendants by separate plaintiffs, arises out of the alleged injuries Plaintiff Katherine Crockett sustained after being administered Injectafer, an iron-replacement medication used to treat iron deficiency anemia. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Pineda v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.