Legal Opinion

Juan Araujo-Lopez v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 13, 1969No. 22705_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of the sale of heroin to government agents, knowing it to have been illegally brought into the United States. While the sale took place near the Mexican border, the heroin was not then being smuggled across. The sale was arranged, and the purchase money received, by a codefendant who pleaded guilty to a lesser offense and testified against appellant.

Considering the evidence in its most favorable light to the Government, as we must on this appeal, we can find in the record no satisfactory proof of any possession, either actual or implied, of the heroin in appellant, or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Grady B. Burroughs, Also Known as Sam Grady Biggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  3. George L. Glenn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  4. Hercules Gasoline Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United States v. BosticDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Culmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. United States v. L. C. Bagby, United States of America v. Carl StrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Thomas Escobar NobleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  4. Egner v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Bradley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API