Legal Opinion

Mendenhall v. Diamond Plate Glass Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1903No. 20,079PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Howard Circuit Court; J. F. Flliott, Judge. Action by Hannah E. Mendenhall and others against the Diamond Plate Glass Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

Appellants sued appellees to recover damages for the failure of the latter to furnish natural gas for domestic use under a contract executed, as party of the first part, by Sarah A. Trott and Hannah E. Mendenhall and their respective husbands, and the Diamond Plate Glass Company, party of the second part. By this contract the right was granted to the said second party to have ingress and egress to and from one acre of ground, described by metes and hounds, situate in Howard county, Indiana, for the purpose of drilling and operating a gas-well, etc. In consideration of this right the second…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. CurlessIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Deane v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. EbersoleIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hood v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Washington Township v. RattsIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API