Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Mitchell

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873No. 3,386PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fifteenth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The judgment was rendered April 16th, 1870, and notice of motion for a new trial given April 21st, 1870. The other facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Niles, J.:

The action was ejectment against a number of defendants. The plaintiff had a verdict and judgment. The defendants moved for a new trial, and on the 13th of February, 1872, an order was made granting the motion, upon the following terms, expressed in the order: “ On payment by the defendants of all costs herein up to date, and on payment of two hundred dollars, the costs for opposing this motion; that said payment be made in ten days; otherwise that defendants’ motion for a new trial be denied.” On the 12th day of April, 1872, the plaintiff moved for an order denying…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dickey v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bates v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Bjorman v. Fort Bragg Redwood Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Sykes v. BeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Brooks v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Winningham v. PhilbrickWashington Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API