Legal Opinion

Rose v. Southern Michigan National Bank of Coldwater

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1950No. Docket 39, Calendar 44,705Published

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

Plaintiff filed her bill to enforce an agreement to make mutual wills in which wills plaintiff was to be a contingent beneficiary. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals.

Lester E. Rose, a banker at Coldwater, died in 1929, leaving an estate then worth about $525,000. He was survived by his 3 children, Stephen, Bertha and Edith Rose. Plaintiff is Stephen’s widow.

Bertha and Edith never married. Under his will, Lester E. Rose left most of his estate in trust; Stephen, Bertha and Edith were each to receive the income from one-third thereof during their respective lives. If Stephen…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rose v. Southern Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Phelps v. PipherMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API