Legal Opinion

Latham v. . Latham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1922PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action, tried and determined on the pleadings.

The action was instituted in said county on 10 October, 1916, by plaintiffs, certain grandchildren of Fred P. Latham, deceased, successors in title to the pro rata rights and interests of A. C. Latham, Josephine Potts, and Henrietta Tripp, all now deceased, and who took and hold their rights as among the devisees and heirs at law of said F. P. Latham, against S.W. Latham, executor of the will of F. P. Latham, and trustee of certain portions of the real estate under said will.

Subsequent to the institution of the suit, defendant S.W. Latham,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Peacock v. Barnes.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Oldham v. . RiegerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Cherry v. Canal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Ewbank v. . LymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Trustees of the University of North Carolina v. State National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. North Carolina State Ports Authority v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Teachey v. . GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. City of Reidsville v. BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Simmons v. FridaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  5. Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United States of America, Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API