Legal Opinion
City of Austin v. Casiraghi
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 29, 1983No. 13532PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
POWERS, Justice.
Our earlier opinion of April 6, 1983, is withdrawn and the following is substituted in its stead.
The City of Austin, Texas filed in the county court of Travis County a petition in eminent domain to acquire, for public use, the entirety of three lots owned by Arturo Casiraghi and his wife, Louisa. The lots were within the municipal limits. The principal issue on appeal concerns the legality of the money damages awarded by the trial court for the property. We will reform the judgment below and affirm it as reformed.
The record reflects that the Casiraghis…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- City of Lagrange v. PierattTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Coastal Industrial Water Authority v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- City of Dallas v. PrioloTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Abilene v. Burk Royalty CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. Central Expressway Sign AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Dallas County v. Crestview Corners Car WashCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Klein Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- State v. McCarley, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- AVM-HOU, Ltd. v. Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.