Von Eberstein v. Standard Oil Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. Where a debtor proposed to pay a certain per centum of his indebtedness, and at the same time paid some of his creditors a larger proportion of their claims, but kept that fact concealed from the creditors who accepted the proposed settlement, such settlement was fraudulent and void, and did not bind the creditors. Saul v. Buck, 72 Ga. 254 (5). Thus, an agreement with certain creditors whereby they agreed to accept twenty-five per cent, of their claims in full settlement, made upon condition that all unsecured creditors should accept the same terms, would not be binding if such creditors…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dendy v. Gamble & CopelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Saul v. Buck, Hefflebower & NeerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Johnstone v. Etowah Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
3Cited by1 opinion
- Block v. City of West Palm BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940