Legal Opinion

Lyle v. Slegman

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1922No. 1384PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Judge First Circuit. Hon. C. S. Franklin, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KEMP, J.

Petitioner filed his bill entitled “Bill for Discovery, Injunction and Relief in Equity,” but essentially a creditor’s bill, to subject a certain promissory note and mortgage, executed by the respondents Cecil L. Bell and Nellie B. Heffernan, alleged to belong to the respondent Barton D. Slegman, but standing in the name of his wife Lucile R. Slegman, in the actual possession of the Henry Waterhouse Trust Company, Limited, to the payment of his alleged debt against said Barton D. Slegman. It is *352alleged in substance that said note was transferred to Lucile R.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Case v. BeauregardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Cates v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Pendleton v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  4. National Tube Works Co. v. BallouSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Robinson v. Springfield Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1885

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henry Waterhouse Trust Co. v. KingHawaii Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Yuen v. Hawaiian Homes CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API