Shaulis v. Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice NEWMAN.
The Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission (Commission) appeals from an Order of the Commonwealth Court, which determined that Section 1103(g) of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (Ethics Act)1 was unconstitutional as applied to Kathleen K. Shaulis, Esquire (Shaulis) because it violated Article V, Section 10(c) of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which provides that this Court has the exclusive authority to regulate the conduct of an attorney insofar as it constitutes the practice of law.2 For the reasons discussed herein, we affirm the Order of the Commonwealth…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- P.J.S. v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Wajert v. State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Bar Ass'n v. ThornburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Maunus v. Com., State Ethics Com'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Gmerek v. State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. VeonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Yocum v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Villani v. Seibert Appeal of: SeibertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Beyers v. RichmondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.