Legal Opinion

Roberts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 16, 1931No. 20545PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Where a person is employed to sell, by distribution over neighboring territory, the products of the employer, by operating from a plant belonging to the employer, under a contract, terminable at the will of the employer, by which the employee is described as a “commission agent” for the employer, and is to conduct the business under instructions from, and on terms and conditions prescribed by, the employer, his compensation being a percentage of the gross receipts from the sales after they have been remittee! to the employer, whose property *669they are, the person so employed is the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. StapletonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. MiddlebrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Gulf Refining Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Phipps v. Gulf Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hockmuth v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  2. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PratherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. Sinclair Refining Co. v. VealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Joiner v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API