Legal Opinion

Barfus v. City of Miami

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 26, 1991No. Nos. 89-5640, 89-5641PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal by Miami firefighters (Barfus et al.) and a Miami police officer (Sullivan) from the district court’s dismissal of their Title VII action for reverse discrimination as an impermissible collateral attack on a consent decree. The district court dismissed the complaints pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), reasoning that because the complaints constituted collateral attacks, the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over appellants’ claims.1 Because we hold that appellants’ Title VII complaints do not constitute collateral attacks on the consent decree,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Robert J. Meza v. General Battery Corporation and Provident Life and Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Terminal Railroad Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Navajo Nation v. San Juan CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. White v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Crum v. AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2003
  4. Najiy v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. O'Shea v. City of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API