Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Estate of Newton
California Supreme Court
Decided September 7, 1950No. L. A. 20827Published
1ConcurrenceTraynor, J.
I concur, but deem it advisable to spell out with particularity the reasons for my concurrence.
The Inheritance Tax Acts of this state plainly provide for *837the imposition of the tax in the present case. Section 2 of the Inheritance Tax Act of 1935 as amended in 1941, by which this appeal is governed, provides:
“A tax shall be and is hereby imposed upon the transfer of any property, real or personal, or of any interest therein or income therefrom, in trust or otherwise . . . said taxes to be upon'the market value of such property at the date of death of the decedent and at the rates hereinafter…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Curry v. McCanlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.