Dailey v. Preferred Masonic Mutual Accident Ass'n of America
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion
Upon application of plaintiff a rehearing was granted, and the case reargued May 2, 1894. Upon October 16, 1894, the following opinion was filed, affirming the judgment of the court below:
2Per curiam
A rehearing was granted in this case on account of the doubt we entertained, when the motion for the rehearing was made, as to the correctness of the holding that the suit could not be maintained upon the policy of insurance, but should have been brought upon the contract effected by the application and the acceptance of the defendant indorsed thereon. • This question was not fully presented upon the former…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Chrisman v. State InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Rogers v. Cedar Rapids Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887