Legal Opinion

Dailey v. Preferred Masonic Mutual Accident Ass'n of America

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1894Published

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion

Upon application of plaintiff a rehearing was granted, and the case reargued May 2, 1894. Upon October 16, 1894, the following opinion was filed, affirming the judgment of the court below:

2Per curiam

A rehearing was granted in this case on account of the doubt we entertained, when the motion for the rehearing was made, as to the correctness of the holding that the suit could not be maintained upon the policy of insurance, but should have been brought upon the contract effected by the application and the acceptance of the defendant indorsed thereon. • This question was not fully presented upon the former…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chrisman v. State InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Rogers v. Cedar Rapids Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API