Legal Opinion

Fort Smith Light & Traction Co. v. Board of Improvement of Paving District No. 16

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1927No. BOARD OF IMPROVEMENT OF PAVING DIST. NO. 16 OF CITPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Defendant in error, a board of improvement incorporated by the State of Arkansas, brought suit in the Circuit Court of Sebastian County, to recover the cost of paving a part of certain streets in Fort Smith, Arkansas,; occupied by the street railway of plaintiff in error. Plaintiff in error originally operated its railway under a fran-, chise requiring it to do similar paving and limiting it to a maximum fare of five cents per passenger. Availing of the permission granted by No. 571 of the Acts of Arkansas, 1919, amended by No. 124 of 1921, the company had surrendered in that year its…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dorrance v. County of DouglasNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Fort Smith Light & Traction Co. v. Board of Improvement of Paving Dist. No. 16 of City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API