Legal Opinion

Fort Smith Light & Traction Co. v. Board of Improvement of Paving Dist. No. 16 of City of Fort Smith

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1927No. 269PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

274 U.S. 387 (1927)

FORT SMITH LIGHT AND TRACTION COMPANY

v.

BOARD OF IMPROVEMENT OF PAVING DISTRICT NO. 16 OF THE CITY OF FORT SMITH.

No. 269.

Supreme Court of United States.

Submitted March 17, 1927.

Decided May 16, 1927.

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS.

Messrs. Joseph M. Hill, Henry L. Fitzhugh, and R.M. Campbell for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. John P. Woods and Harry P. Daily for defendant in error.

2Opinion of the Court · StoneJustice Stone

Defendant in error, a board of improvement incorporated by the State of Arkansas, brought suit in the Circuit Court of Sebastian County, to recover the cost of paving a part of…

3Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moseley v. WELCHSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  2. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  3. State v. Indiana RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API