Legal Opinion
Gilmore v. Rubeck
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 19, 1985No. 84CA0360PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Judge.
This appeal arises from a dispute over whether a particular mineral deposit was properly located as a lode claim by plaintiff, Marguerette Gilmore (Gilmore), or as a placer claim by defendants, Walter M. Ru-beck, Georgia J. Rubeck, Joe Straziscar, and Rose M. Straziscar (Rubecks). Gilmore obtained a temporary injunction and posted a bond. On Gilmore’s allegations of trespass and request for injunctive relief and damages, the master found in favor of Rubecks and was upheld by the district court on review. Subsequently, Rubecks filed a motion seeking an award of costs and damages…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Cole v. RalphSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- American Bible Society v. BlountCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Phillips v. Monarch Recreation Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- Cope v. Vermeer Sales & Service of Colorado, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bergmann v. BoyceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- National Canada Corp. v. DikeouColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of IllinoisColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Bowers v. Loveland Publishing Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988
- Murphy-Sims v. Owners Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019