Legal Opinion
Phillips v. Monarch Recreation Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided May 12, 1983No. 81CA0731PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STERNBERG, Judge.
John Phillips sued the Monarch Recreation Corporation for injuries and damages he sustained when he collided with trail grooming equipment at Monarch’s ski area. The jury returned a verdict for Phillips and Monarch appeals. We affirm.
After skiing down a run at Monarch known as Ray’s Romp, Phillips collided with a trail grooming machine called a sno-cat as he came around a blind corner at the bottom of the run. He testified that he was unable to see the sno-cat until several seconds before the collision and that he attempted to tighten his turn when he saw it but was unable to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Converse v. ZinkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- City of Aurora v. LovelessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Kitto v. GilbertColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
- Chart Ex Rel. Sommer v. General Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Iacino v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Hock v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Doering Ex Rel. Barrett v. Copper Mountain, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Alzado v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Williams v. Chrysler Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- South Park Aggregates, Inc. v. Northwestern National Insurance Co. of Milwaukee, WisconsinColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.