Hirt v. City of Erie
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 141, Jan. T., 1901, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Erie Co., No. 6, in equity, in case of F. W. Flirt v. City of Erie. Before McCollum, C. J., Mitchell, Fell, Brown and Potter, JJ. Affirmed. Bill in equity for an injunction to restrain the issue of a municipal bond.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 141, Jan. T., 1901, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Erie Co., No. 6, in equity, in case of F. W. Flirt v. City of Erie. Before McCollum, C. J., Mitchell, Fell, Brown and Potter, JJ. Affirmed. Bill in equity for an injunction to restrain the issue of a municipal bond. Walling, P. J., filed the following opinion: This is a taxpayer’s bill, filed to restrain the city of Erie and its officers from creating a municipal indebtedness in alleged violation of section 8, article 9 of the constitution of this commonwealth. The case was heard upon bill, answer, replication and testimony.…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam,
The assignments of error are based on the plaintiff’s excep*226tions to the findings of fact and conclusions of law filed by the court. The findings and conclusions which are attacked and constitute the alleged errors of the court, appear in the first, second and third assignments and in the decree of the court dismissing the plaintiff’s bill and charging him with the costs. A careful examination of the assignments and the exceptions on which they are based has failed to satisfy this court of error in the findings and conclusions of the court below. We therefore affirm the decree of…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CannonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Keeney v. County Court of Kanawha CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
- Bd. of Educ. of County of Hancock v. SlackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- Banta v. Clarke CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Schuldice v. PittsburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.