Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fredrickson v. Button

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 2018No. 7289 S-15857Published

1DissentBolger, Justice

The superior court found that Shelley Fredrickson left her employment after receiving $300,000 in settlement payments from the government of Japan. But this court's decision requires the superior court to reconsider whether Fredrickson's compensation payment should be considered income for child support purposes. In my opinion, the evidence is sufficient to support the superior court's conclusion. When Forest Button's counsel asked, "Did you receive a settlement from Japan for your brother?" (Emphasis added.) Fredrickson responded, "Yes, I did." She then confirmed that the settlement was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Arneson v. ArnesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Nass v. SeatonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Crayton v. CraytonAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In re StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  5. Sherburne County Social Services Ex Rel. Schafer v. RiedleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API