Legal Opinion

Batson v. City Laundry Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

At the hearing of the defendant’s motion that the action be dismissed for the reason, among others, that the judgment of nonsuit in the former action is a bar to plaintiff’s recovery in this action, the court considered the evidence offered by the plaintiff at the trial, and from such evidence found the facts on which the motion of the defendant was allowed. See Batson v. Laundry Co., 206 N. C., 371, 174 S. E., 90. Ordinarily, if there was evidence tending to show the facts on which a motion was allowed, or denied, to be as found by the court, its findings of fact will not be reviewed by this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hampton v. . Spinning CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Batson v. City Laundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Batson v. City Laundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Smith v. McDowell Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API