Price Hill Colliery Co. v. Pinkney
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MieleR, Judge:
Plaintiff brought this action in assumpsit for the balance alleged to be due it from defendant on an open account. De fendant pleaded non-assumpit, and filed a notice of set-off and counterclaim, together with a statement of the amount alleged to be due him from plaintiff. The verdict of the jury-in favor of defendant was set aside by the trial court, and a new trial was awarded plaintiff.
Some time in the month of July 1918, defendant entered the employ of plaintiff as superintendent of its coal plant at Price Hill. Plaintiff agreed to pay him for his services a monthly salary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sesler v. Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
- Chapman v. Liverpool Salt & Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
- Ruffner, Donnally & Co. v. Hewitt, Kercheval & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1874
- Shrewsbury v. TuftsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
- Lewis & Frazier v. ChildersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thornsbury v. ThornsburyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Rufus v. EasleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
- Adkins v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
- Crawford v. CoinerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
- Brewer v. Appalachian Constructors, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.