Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Liverpool Salt & Coal Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1905PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Mason County. Action by F. A. Chapman against the Liverp'ool Salt & Coal Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, Judge;

The plaintiff, F. A. Chapman, brought his action of as-sumpsit in the circuit court of Mason county against the Liverpool Salt and Coal Company, and recovered a judgment for the sum of $200.00, to which judgment a writ of error and supersedeas was allowed upon the petition of the defendant.

The defendant claims that the circuit court should have set aside the verdict of the jury and awarded it a new trial, because neither the law nor the evidence warranted the verdict, and also for the reason that all the matters in difference between it and plaintiff had been settled, and the…

2Cited by37 opinions

  1. Hartley v. CredeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Hartley v. CredeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Ritz v. KingdonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Ritz v. KingdonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Hollen v. LingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API