Legal Opinion

Niegos v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1954No. 18,468PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoyse, J.

Appellant brought this action against appellees for damages because of personal injuries received when he was run over by a train operated by appellees.

The facts as disclosed by the record may be summarized as follows: In the City of East Chicago there is a public park known as Koscioszko Park. Along the south boundary of said park appellees owned and operated two railroad tracks. These tracks, as they pass said park, are bounded on the south by a tract of two or three acres of waste land which is bounded on the south by the Calumet River. For many years prior to June 3,1942, children of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MeansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. KrayenbuhlNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Indianapolis Railways, Inc. v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Town of Argos v. HarleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Bottorff v. South Construction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. DiamondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Palmer v. DeckerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API