Legal Opinion
Kulzer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 8, 1991No. Nos. 1230, 1231, Dockets 90-9062, 90-9132PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESKILL, Circuit Judge:
The dispositive question raised on appeal is whether this wrongful death action falls within an exception to section 4 of the New York Toxic Tort Reform Act of 1986, Ch. 682, § 4, reprinted in 1 McKinney’s Session Laws of New York 1567 (1986) (“revival statute” or “statute”). Plaintiff Pauline Kulzer (plaintiff) brought this wrongful death action under the revival statute on behalf of her deceased husband Richard Kulzer (Kulzer) in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, Telesca, J. One of the defenses raised by appellant Owens-Corning…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Steinhardt v. Johns-Manville Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- City of Parma v. Record Revolution, No. 6, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Santos v. District Council of New York CityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Monte v. National Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Katherine A. Zotos v. Lindbergh School District O. Victor Lenz, Jr. Joseph A. SartoriusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Transaero, Inc. v. La Fuerza Aerea BolivianaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Executive Sandwich Shoppe, Inc. v. Carr Realty Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Greenberg v. United States Department of TreasuryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- In Re Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.