Legal Opinion

Stepp v. Richman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 9, 1947No. 31572PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

In order for the plaintiff in a dispossessory-warrant proceeding to recover on the ground that the defendant tenant is holding over and beyond his term, it is encumbent on the plaintiff to show the nature and term of the tenancy in order to establish the fact of the holding over. In April 1946, the plaintiff, a partnership, purchased from a landlord a dwelling occupied by the present defendant and wrote the tenant: “Please be advised that as of April 1 . . [we] have purchased the house you reside in. . . There is a possibility that we will in the very near future resell this property and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Willis v. HarrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Roberson v. SimonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Byrne v. BeardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Anthony Shoals Power Co. v. FortsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  5. Heaton v. Fulton National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Erfani v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Turner Communications Corp. v. HickcoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Wilson v. Healey Real Estate & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Richardson v. LampleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Williams v. StarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API