Legal Opinion

Mockovak v. Haynes

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided July 23, 2021No. 2:18-cv-00671Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 MICHAEL E. MOCKOVAK, CASE NO. C18-0671JLR-MLP 11 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART v. THE REPORT AND 12 RECOMMENDATION RON HAYNES, 13 Respondent. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 This matter comes before the court on United States Magistrate Judge Michelle L. 17 Peterson’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (R&R (Dkt. # 75)) and Petitioner 18 Michael E. Mockovak’s objections to the R&R (Obj. (Dkt. # 78)). The court has 19 reviewed Mr. Mockovak’s amended habeas petition (Am. Pet. (Dkt. # 28)), his traverse 20…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API