Legal Opinion

Basch v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 1942No. Civ. A. 1439PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcWILLIAMS, J.

The court granted a rehearing in this ease for the purpose of giving further consideration to the doctrine laid down in the Smith v. Yule, 31 Cal. 180 [89 Am. Dec. 167], and the other cases, which under varying circumstances, have followed and applied the principle of that case. The consideration that we have given to the subject following the rehearing has led us to the conclusion that our original judgment of reversal was correct. The doctrine of the Yule case (supra) and of the eases that have followed it has been stated as follows:

“In order that possession by one other than the vendor of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eversdon v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Smith v. YuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Pell v. McElroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Boone v. ChilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  5. Ewald v. HuftonIdaho Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spickler v. Lombardo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API