Legal Opinion

Spickler v. Lombardo

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County

Decided December 13, 1978No. 277 Civil 1975Published

1Opinion of the Court

COFFROTH, P.J.,

This case is before the court en banc on defendants’ motions for judgment n.o.v. and new trial following a jury verdict for plaintiff in an action for fraudulent misrepresentations of title in a sale of goods by defendants to plaintiff.

Numerous troublesome legal issues permeated the trial and have been raised here, but we think one of them is dispositive of the case and is the only one which need be fully considered. Under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code — Secured Transactions — of April 6, 1953, P.L. 3, as amended, 12A P.S. §9-101 et seq. (hereinafter called Code)…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Scaife Co. v. Rockwell-Standard Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Neuman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API