Legal Opinion

State v. Romero

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 23, 1997No. Nos. 01-94-01219-CR through 01-94-01221-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Justice.

Miguel Romero, the appellee, was arrested on drug charges on October 27, 1993. Upon his arrest, the State seized $71,660 and other property. On October 27, 1993, the State Comptroller assessed a controlled substance stamp tax of $475,726 in connection with the drugs and filed a notice of levy. The State seized $3,246.04 from Romero’s bank account, in partial satisfaction of the tax.1 The State filed a forfeiture action against the seized cash and property on November 10, 1993 (trial court cause number 9358525). On August 12, 1994, the trial court signed an agreed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greenville v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1990
  2. State v. Balderas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
  3. Ex parte TorresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. State v. Romero, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  5. State v. RomeroCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ex parte DupuyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Hegar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  3. Ex Parte Jacob Ryan Evans, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
  4. Ex Parte Bui, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  5. Coy, Carlos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API