Legal Opinion

State v. Romero

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 11, 1997No. Nos. 1259-95 to 1261-95PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellee was charged with possession of marihuana and possession of cocaine. In a forfeiture proceeding the trial court entered a judgment releasing cash and personal property to the State. Additionally, according to the Court of Appeals’ recitation of the facts, the State Comptroller assessed and sought to collect a controlled substance stamp tax of $476,726 from the defendant in connection with the marihuana. State v. Romero, 907 S.W.2d 858, 859 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1995). The State seized $3,246.04 from Appellee’s bank account…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Stennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. State v. Romero, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API