Legal Opinion

Baker v. Reese

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 29, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAY, Commissioner.

This is a boundary dispute between the appellant and appellees. The parties stipulated that the “William Reese line” was the common line between their properties and that the correct location of this line was the matter in controversy. The trial judge first entered a judgment in accordance with the stipulation, fixing this boundary. He subsequently set that judgment aside and entered the judgment appealed from, which ■did not make any attempt to locate the “'William Reese line” but fixed another boundary to which appellees had claimed adverse possession. (The judgment also…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baker v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
  2. Ky. Ret. Sys. v. ChamberlainCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2018
  3. Tu v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API