Baker v. Reese
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
CLAY, Commissioner.
This is a boundary dispute between the appellant and appellees. The parties stipulated that the “William Reese line” was the common line between their properties and that the correct location of this line was the matter in controversy. The trial judge first entered a judgment in accordance with the stipulation, fixing this boundary. He subsequently set that judgment aside and entered the judgment appealed from, which ■did not make any attempt to locate the “'William Reese line” but fixed another boundary to which appellees had claimed adverse possession. (The judgment also…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Baker v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
- Ky. Ret. Sys. v. ChamberlainCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2018
- Tu v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994